|
We welcome opinions on topics of local interest!
Send a letter to the editor!
Remember to include your name, hometown and daytime phone number (we won't publish your phone number). We reserve
the right to edit for length and legal considerations.
Editorial
A little light goes a long way
Goffstown's Highway Safety Committee, led by Police
Chief Michael French, has recommended to the board of
selectmen that a traffic signal be placed at the intersection of
Wallace and Shirley Hill roads in Goffstown.
Twenty-five accidents have occurred there in the past three
years, eight of them involving serious injuries.
Apparently they've tried other things . warning signs that a
stop is ahead, bigger stop signs, grooves on the road. But the
accidents continue.
Anyone who's driven that stretch of Wallace Road knows
how dangerous it is. Whether you're driving to or from Bedford,
the stop comes up quickly, and when you are stopped,
it's almost impossible to see very far down the road because it
curves so close to the intersection. Even if you haven't had an
accident there, maybe you've had a close call. And in winter,
it's slippery and even more dangerous.
So the selectmen want to think about it some more, try
another option, maybe. But what hasn't been tried yet?
They want to be sure that a light will prevent accidents.
They want to save money.
But why is it that the powers that be wait to take steps to
save lives until a life is gone?
Because that's what's going to happen, given enough time.
It's time to do something about that intersection. No matter
what it costs.
-Christine Heiser
Letters
There'd be no deficits if entitlements were cut from budget
To the Editor:
The most recent edition of
The Goffstown News contained
a letter titled, "Bush's plan for
Social Security is gambling with
the future."
There is so much misinformation
circulating, concerning this
subject. And this letter is either
part of that campaign or from
someone that is poorly informed
as to the crisis this nation is
facing.
Let me begin by stating three
indisputable facts:
Social Security will be paying
out more than it brings in
2017.
Social Security will be bankrupt
by 2042.
Bush's plan does not affect
people 55 or older.
There is no denying these
facts.
Something must be done
about this now or no one that
has payed into Social Security
will receive anything from it.
That is a bad return on an
investment, don't you think?
If it is looked at logically,
Social Security is not secure
and won't be unless something
is done. People also seem to
have lost sight of what Social
Security is, it is a retirement
supplement to defray the costs
of living with no active source
of income.
Read the Social Security Act
sometime; it is very interesting
reading.
If the "baby boomers" and
seniors will quit acting so infantile,
they will see that by the time
their children and grandchildren
retire, those generations will be
paying for huge increases in the
Social Security tax and cuts in
benefits. Are they so selfish that
they can't see that their children
and grandchildren will exist just
to pay Social Security taxes?
This is a very unfair burden to
the younger generations. I know
I don't want my daughter paying
50 percent or more of her
income to Social Security.
What does this quote have to
do with Social Security?
"We've seen wiped-out retirement
funds; from Enron and
Lucent to Healthsouth and
WorldCom: Millions of stock/
retirement dollars evaporated."
This has nothing to do with
Social Security, these are 401ks
etc. I believe anyone who invested
in these companies signed
something to the effect of: their
investment is not guaranteed a
profit and could lose money.
They did not decide how
your Social Security money is
invested.
These companies or companies
like them will not be running
our personal retirement
accounts. These companies.
executives are being investigated,
charged and convicted for
the crimes they committed.
President Bush misspoke
about the T bills. T bills were
an incorrect term. This is what
I believe he was trying to convey.
Congress for years now has
been taking money from the
Social Security trust fund and
using it for the general budget.
And they (Congress) have
issued worthless IOUs, because
Congress has no intention of
paying the money back.
The private stock market is
not a risky gamble. It is a gamble,
but life is a gamble. Take a
look at the long-term growth of
the stock market. It has grown
consistently and steadily in the
last 50 years.
Yes, there economic downturns,
but they are short-lived
and sporadic . all in all a good
vehicle for long term investment.
If it is looked at with the
short term in mind it is quite
volatile. But retirement is being
discussed here and the longterm
model should always be
considered, not the short term.
President Bush's plan for
Social Security might not be
the best plan. It is the only plan
I have heard, and I have yet to
hear one idea from the opposition.
Instead of bemoaning how
wrong Bush's plan is, why not
put some viable alternatives on
the table for discussion. And
by alternatives I don't mean tax
increases.
All I keep hearing is how we
can't change the cornerstone of
FDR's New Deal.
Personally, I would like to see
the Social Security Act, the Welfare
Act and any other entitlement
act repealed. Congress and
the president have no constitutional
authority to enact legislation
for the express purpose of
taking money from one group
and giving it to another. This
power is not enumerated once in
the Constitution. If all this was
cut from the budget, deficits
would be nonexistent.
Mark Loveless
Goffstown
Our restorative justice plan would be a fairer athletic code
To the Editor:
Sorry kids, we tried. A year
or so ago, a group of enthusiastic
and concerned parents met
together to review and hopefully
rewrite the John Stark
High School Athletic Code of
Conduct.
We were concerned about
what we considered several pitfalls
of the policy, the most glaring
being the fact that if you
stole, vandalized or hazed, you
were merely suspended from the
team for a certain number of
games to be determined by the
athletic director on a case-bycase
basis. However, if you were
caught drinking, doing drugs or
were in the presence of someone
who was drinking or doing
drugs, you were immediately
dismissed from the team for the
remainder of the season.
Although none of us condoned
the use of illegal substances by
the youth of JSR, many of us
felt that it sent a mixed message
about what the John Stark community
considered a forgivable
transgression. It was clear and
understandable that the "decision-
makers" wanted to send
a strong message about illegal
drug and alcohol use, while our
committee felt equally strong
that stealing, vandalism and hazing
ranked right up there on the
list of no-no's. Is one really any
worse than the other?
After reviewing many of the
studies that conclude that .zerotolerance
. drug policies are ineffective
as being a deterrent to
alcohol/drug use and new studies
about the workings of the
teenage brain, our group proposed
what we believed was a
more responsible way to address
this very difficult issue.
We modeled our program after
the Hillsboro Youth Court's system
of restorative justice, a philosophy
that is practiced around
the world. It is for the first-time
offender only. It includes all
types of infractions. Its premise
and research recognizes that
people can make mistakes, but
allows the person the opportunity
to take responsibility and
learn from their mistakes. The
student would be suspended for
a certain number of games and
then have the opportunity to
redeem him/herself by fulfilling
a contract of demands tailored to
the offense.
This would have been administered
by a group of school
personnel and community members.
We presented our plan to
the school board. It was positively
received and then sometime
over the summer the new
idea was scrapped.
We were told they appreciated
our input but the policy
was going to stay as is. However,
they were going to add a
counseling component for the
alcohol/drug users.
So here we are a year later and
there was a party somewhere
within the last couple of weeks
at which some athletes both "in"
and "out" of season got caught
for drinking. Unfortunately, we
can't say that we are surprised.
What we can say, though,
is that we know that you are
all good kids that made a poor
choice. For those of you that
have been thrown off your team,
we are truly sorry that you won't
be able to benefit from our plan.
We continue to believe our plan
of restorative justice would have
allowed you the opportunity to
redeem yourselves in the eyes
of your school community, kept
you busy by staying involved
with your team and perhaps
given you an incentive not to
drink next Saturday night.
Jeanne Daniel
Ruth Cherry
Deb Dow
Jackie Cowell
Margaret Glover
Thanks to all who helped make Weare Kidfest a success
To the Editor:
A big thank you to all who
participated in the Weare PTO
Literacy Committee KidFest on
Sunday, April 17, and making it
a success.
The climbing wall from Vertical
Dreams was a hit, along with
officer Chauvette and his dog
Rex from the Goffstown Police
Department.
We also would like to thank
officer Peterson and officer
Clark from the Weare Police
Department for their bike safety
training class.
Thank you to all parents and
kids who brought your bikes.
We had no idea this was going
to be such a big hit that we look
forward to doing this again next
year and spending more time
with it.
Thank you to the Weare Fire
Department for bringing a fire
truck and an ambulance. The
water show was spectacular.
Thank you to Riverside Tae-
KwonDo for showing us the
moves and to Chris Hague from
the Weare Public Library for a
great storytime.
We would also like to thank
The Dog Bite Hot Dog Cart
for providing refreshments, Carl
Knapp for bringing a grader for
us to look at and Mrs. Milano,
Center Woods Elementary
School art teacher, for providing
the art projects.
And a final thank you to all
the parents and students who
participated, making it a fun
afternoon.
Lynn Hanna
Weare Friends PTO Literacy Committee
Fundamentalist Republicans are trying to dominate government
To the Editor:
The fundamental Christian
evangelicals so powerful in the
Republican party are now showing
what they will do with their
control of America's government.
The witnessed wishes of
Terri Schiavo are instead to be
controlled by religious dogma
on "life." Will my husband be
vilified a murderer or worse just
because I choose not to live in
the condition Mrs. Schiavo did?
Is this what the last election was
about?
Now, imagine a religious man
gets elected president with the
support of millions of his faith.
Kennedy claims a mandate.
President Kennedy announces
new Catholic dogma laws: no
divorce or contraception, public
tax dollars for Catholic schools,
books banned and no meat on
Fridays!
Republican heads would
explode! There would be a
coast-to-coast revolt!
"How dare those Catholics
force their faith on our laws?"
Now look at the headlines
with the radical Christian fundamentalists
leading a pandering
Congress by the nose to
an unconstitutional law for one
person!
This religious right is flexing
its newfound evangelical muscle.
Their Republican evangelical
leaders like Falwell, Robertson
and Dobson have announced
their goal to remake our laws
to fit their personal religious
views. According to evangelical
Republican leaders, American
law needs to be based on Biblical
law, much like Iran is based
on the Koran. They make no
secret of these plans. Televangelists
say jump and Mr. Frist and
DeLay ask how high? They are
determined to have their version
of Biblical law injected into our
government and anyone who
isn't in agreement? Tough!
"You're a terrorist" or "persecutor
of Christians," say GOP
activists like Randall Terry.
The repression has already
begun. Women have already
gone to their pharmacy to fill
contraception prescriptions,
only to be told that under the
new law, the pharmacist can
choose to not fill it if he feels
contraception is wrong.
Married woman have been
denied legal emergency contraception.
Doctors can now choose
not to prescribe contraceptives
in the same "conscience" law.
Their religious conscience rights
supersede my right to buy my
medicine? Why? We aren't a
theocracy. Can they refuse to
sell condoms? Why do their religious
rights get to bulldoze my
rights?
Science teachers are being
intimidated to include a Christian
creation story in place of
scientific evidence on evolution
in the biology class of all students.
Instead of having a parental
opt-out option in health class,
accurate health information on
disease and pregnancy have
been replaced for all students
with "just say no." Evidently
it's preferable to have kids contract
AIDS than to have accurate
health information. How Christian
is that?
Replacing science with religious
beliefs has become so
prevalent in several of our
national agencies like EPA that
scientists have banded together
to try to ring the alarm. Movies
have been shut down for mentioning
the evolution of volcanic
microbial life. Women's clinics
have been bombed and their
doctors intimidated and even
murdered. Incredibly, a murder
contract was put out on a Schiavo
case judge as well as on her
husband by someone in "the
religious culture of life."
No need for clean environment
laws, Jesus is coming soon,
so pollute away because there
will be no future generations
who will need those resources
anyway.
Oh, and if the "end" doesn't
happen, our great-grandkids get
a dangerously polluted resourcepoor
planet!
Check out "dominionists"
online. Evidently Jesus has
changed his mind on the whole
"care for the poor" thing, too,
judging from the Bush budget
cuts to the handicapped, the
children, our veterans and the
increasing numbers of poor citizens.
"Blessed are the peacemakers";
they are called unpatriotic.
Contrary to the Christian right
babble, the founding fathers were
not fundamentalist Christians,
they were deists who believed
in a divine presence without the
dogma and self-righteousness of
many churches of their time.
As followers of the enlightenment,
they would be fighting
against the Christian fundamentalist
efforts at religious domination
of our government. Voices
against all this are starting to be
heard, from concerned voters to
equally concerned church leaders.
Check out the voting record
of your representatives and be
heard.
Jeanne Stapleton
New Boston
May is foster care month, so find out what you can do to help
To the Editor:
Are you planning your summer
vacation yet? What will it
be? Disney World? Camping?
Or just enjoying watching your
kids splash in the pool, pond
or lake? Spring is a wonderful
time. Smell those flowers! It's
relaxing to think about summer
plans; good to dream about a
happy time to come.
Some children have had a
hard winter. Things may be easier
for them now that they can
spend more time outdoors. No
more heavy clothes with long
sleeves for a while. Child abuse
is more obvious during warm
weather. School staff often see
its results in unexplained bruises
and marks on a child. These
kids may need to be placed in
foster care.
May is foster care month. If
you know a foster parent ask
them about fostering and thank
them for the good work they do.
Then find out how you can help.
Call your local Concord DCYF
foster care worker at (800) 322-
9191.
Jan Feuer
New Hampshire Foster and Adoptive Parent Association
Concord
|